DAO governance pages: a proposals overview with live tallies and a proposal page with the full text, results, timeline, and voting.
governance-proposals.tsxA governance overview with live stats, a closing-soon proposal with a rolling countdown and per-choice results, and a searchable list whose vote splits and quorum update as votes arrive.
Vote on proposals that shape the protocol. Your voting power counts toward quorum the moment you vote.
Your voting power
12,480 HALO
Cut the fee tier for stable-to-stable pools from 0.04% to 0.01% for a 90-day trial, with an automatic review of volume and LP returns at the end.
3,118 voters
72.0%22.6%
Quorum
74%
53.6%44.9%
Quorum
100%
governance-proposal-detail.tsxA proposal page with the author, a live countdown, the proposal text, a timeline that draws to the current step, a feed of votes with delegates' reasons, and a sticky results column where members cast their vote.
Voting ends in
Retain two independent audit firms for twelve months to review every change to the core and bridge contracts before it ships, instead of commissioning one-off audits per release.
We shipped nine contract upgrades this year and audited four of them. The bridge carries most of the protocol's value, and its last full review is seven months old.
A standing retainer gives reviewers context across releases, shortens turnaround to days, and costs less than buying audits one at a time.
Proposal created
Oct 9
Voting opened
Oct 11
Voting ends
Oct 21
Timelock
Oct 21 – 23
Execution
Oct 23
“Point-in-time audits miss upgrades shipped between them. A retainer closes that gap.”
“Quarterly payments tied to public reports keep this accountable.”
“Support the goal, but I would rather run a competitive bid first.”
“Conflict of interest: I advise one of the shortlisted firms.”